Climate emergency ... How certain are you ?
Download PDFExposes the climate alarm as an invented scare without basis in science. Featuring interviews from prominent scientists. It also shows that there is no evidence that changing levels of CO2 (it has changed many times) has ever ‘driven’ climate change in the past The film explores the nature of the consensus behind climate change. It describes the origins of the climate funding bandwagon, and the rise of the trillion-dollar climate industry. It describes the hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the climate crisis. It explains the enormous pressure on scientists and others not to question the climate alarm: the withdrawal of funds, rejection by science journals, social ostracism.
Produced for channel 4 in 2007. A full documentary produced by British producer Martin Durkin argues against the virtually unchallenged consensus that global warming is man-made. Man made global warming is the biggest scam of modern times. Warming over the past 300 years represents the natural recovery from the 'little ice age'
There are too many independent expert views being cancelled, marginalised and suppressed. To avert a planning / policy catastrophe and for competent due diligence in public service we call for decision makers to be informed without advisory bias and pre-determination.
INDEPENDENT 'CLIMATE POLICY WATCHDOG'
Climate Intelligence CLINTEL - founded in 2019 as an independent climate change & policy watchdog for scientists and experts with different views about climate and a purpose to communicate objectively and transparently with the general public.
1550 + Scientists & Experts have signed the WORLD CLIMATE DECLARATION
WORST and MOST BIASED IPCC REPORT
Hear about the ongoing institutional bias, cancelling of different scientific views and cherry picking of pro-alarmist climate research. This is informing international policy making. The bias was first identified by independent audit for IPCC report AR3 ( a decade ago). The latest IPCC report AR6 is considered to be the worst and most biased.
THE IPCC REPORTS HAVE INFORMED GOVERNMENT & COUNCIL POLICY = TO DECLARE A CLIMATE EMERGENCY
We call for responsibility, due diligence, full disclosure and transparency in public service / public sector decision and policy making.
Unsettled: Climate and science. Interview with Dr Steven Koonin (Episode 323) : INSIGHT 1:06:00
Climate science: What does it say? Interview with Dr. Richard Linden (Episode 320) : SUMMARY from 1:35:00 to 1:50:00
The world is not ending. Interview with Bjorn Lomborg (Episode 315)
The models are OK, the predictions are wrong. Interview with Dr Judith Curry ( Episode 329) INSIGHT from 49:00 to 1:16:00
NEW PAPER RELEASED (January 2023)
Net Zero Plans Are Dangerous and Unsupported by Science and the Scientific Method
Net Zero initiatives of governments and private organizations are scientifically invalid and will lead to worldwide impoverishment and starvation if implemented, according to a paper published by the CO2 Coalition.
This data “is good enough to demolish the argument that atmospheric CO2 concentrations control Earth’s climate and the theory that fossil fuels and CO2 will cause catastrophic global warming. They will not.”
According to the U.K. Government the average citizen has a carbon equivalent of 6.5 tonnes / person / year. Other studies show this is more like 12 tonnes / person / year.
Have you been consulted about reducing your carbon footprint
= lifestyle, heating, energy use and freedom of movement ?
By 70 to 83 %
How might this be encouraged / enforced ?
In 2019, researchers at the Universities of Cambridge, Oxford, Nottingham, Bath and Imperial College London, published the Absolute Zero report.
The Net Zero strategy requires:
We can expect extreme limitations on personal freedom and travel, this means a colder, hungrier and impoverished population.
QUESTIONS
SUMMARY of ABSOLUTE ZERO & C40 CITIES
Discover what is in store for society in the pursuit of accelerated Net Zero targets through the summaries of two key reports informing Net Zero policy in the U.K.
HOW CERTAIN ARE YOU THAT THESE POLICIES ARE NECESSARY ?
HAVE YOU BEEN PROPERLY INFORMED & CONSULTED ?
IS THIS THE FUTURE WE WANT FOR SOCIETY ?
IS THERE A HIDDEN AGENDA driving GOVERNMENT and BIG CORPORATION OVERREACH ?
WHO STANDS TO GAIN FROM THIS ? ... IS THERE A FINANCIAL FEEDING FRENCY ?
HAS THERE BEEN ADVISORY BIAS ? = YES
Responding to a Freedom of Information request: There appears to be no impact assessments or scenario plans available to the public regarding the social risks and harms from the proposed Net Zero targets upon society.... WHY ?
POINT 1 of 8 : FOSSIL FUELS NO LONGER AN ENERGY SOURCE
WHY ? ...TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE & BEHAVIOUR CHANGE
Matt Hancock told aides he wanted to ensure compliance with COVID-19 restrictions